Advanced Nuclear Energy,
Home Page Site Map (Contents & Chapters) This Chapter's Subdirectory Footnotes & Links
Advanced Reactor Types: Cartridge Type Molten Salt Reactor Generic TRISO Nuclear Reactor General Atomics EM2 TRISO Power Plant The Hook-Ons .pdf
Nuclear Reactors for Stopping Climate Change
Nuclear: The World's Largest Source Of Controllable Energy
In today’s world, every nuclear plant that is not built is a fossil-fuel plant that does get built, which, in most of the world, means coal.
The development of new nuclear reactor power plants is proliferating and there must be over 100 organizations worldwide engaged in bringing some sort of nuclear fission powered reactor or complete electricity power plant to market.
Many types, such as the sodium cooled fast breeder reactor share some of the shortcomings of today's light water cooled reactors - such as too cool to replace fire along with explosion and/or fire hazards.
NOTE: Just as internal combustion engines can be gasoline, diesel, or jet engines, different advanced nuclear reactors have different advantages. The author has separated those advanced reactors useful for replacing fossil fuels into three distinct types:
The author has separated electricity power plants into four distinct groups:
generating units larger than 300 megaWatts.
The 1,200 largest coal plants - producing 30% of all Climate Changing CO2 - are generally amenable to Coal to Nuclear conversions.
FUTURE LARGE - 1,000 new large coal plants are currently being planned. See Future Coal.
1,000 future large coal electricity power plants are currently being planned by various countries. Preemptable by small nuclear barge power plants.
SMALL - Having individual generating units smaller than 300 megaWatts. See Small Coal.
20,000+ small coal plants are generally amenable to coal to combined cycle OxyFuel oil conversions.
BARGE - Ocean going barges with package nuclear electricity power plants. Nuclear Power Plant Barges.
Nuclear Barge electricity power plants. 80% of the world's population is within 60 miles from navigable water.
The reason for doing this is that it appears the "Classical" 290°C (550°F) light water nuclear reactor, optimized for producing only electricity, has reached the end of it's development cycle and smaller, more versatile versions of nuclear reactors are beginning to be considered for use.
Some of the smaller versions are, themselves, 290°C (550°F) light water electricity generation reactors designed to be passively safer and less expensive to deploy.
Other small reactors (generally known as Small Modular Reactors or SMRs) are not light water cooled and have what are regarded as naturally superior safety characteristics and produce more fire-like temperatures.
Each of the three types cited below have distinctive unique characteristics that make them extremely promising in narrower fields of applications. All can be considered to be better substitutes for large industrial fossil fuel fires.
The General Accounting Office issued a report on the outlook for such reactors in the U.S.: Nuclear Reactor Outlook - GAO Report - 671686.pdf
In June, 2015, http://www.thirdway.org/ published a list of 33 private advanced U.S. reactor projects: Advanced Reactor Projects .pdf
Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR) - See item 5.
Well suited to quickly and inexpensively replacing the coal burning boilers in the world's current 1,200 largest electricity power plants.
The 700°C (1,300°F) Molten Salt Reactor runs at atmospheric pressure. Considered very safe, its relatively high temperature, high power density, and extremely low cost fuels make it an ideal replacement upgrade from coal in most respects. Capable of providing steam for the most advanced - i.e., supercritical and ultra-supercritical - steam turbines.
August 2015 U.K.
assessment of molten salt reactor technology:
Molten-Salt Reactor Feasibility Study by EPD (pdf)
Generic High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR)
- See item 4.
Well suited for decarbonized energy's high temperature applications such as hydrogen gas generation and ambient air CO2 extraction.
Being built at the 200 megaWatt(thermal) HTR-PM in
China, planned to be operational in 2017, 40 units to be constructed for
Rongcheng electricity complex. Is regarded by U.S. NRC as mature and safe.
One commercial unit was built at Ft St Vrain, Colorado, ran for a few years (1976 to 1989) as a HTRG, was converted to combined cycle natural gas and is still producing electricity. http://www.fsvfolks.org/FSVHistory_2.html Was considered so safe it did not require to be housed in an explosion containment building.
700°C to 950°C (1,300°F to 1,740°F) Temperature output is essential for Climate Change applications such as Direct Air Capture of CO2, Direct Generation of Hydrogen by Thermochemical processes.
General Atomics EM2 -
HTGR nuclear power plant package.
See item 3.
850 °C (1,600 °F), well suited for mass production and installation on ocean-going barges to power the world's poorest countries. The reactor portion of this 240 megaWatt(electrical) system module is a fast-neutron high temperature gas reactor (HTGR) enabling as long as 30 years between refueling.
The 500°C (930°F) small Fast Breeder Reactor, like the basic light water reactor, does not distinguish itself with sufficiently high temperature output to make it especially useful for Climate Change mitigation applications beyond clean electricity generation. Designed initially to produce abundant high-purity plutonium for safe-to-store nuclear weapons, the Fast Breeder Reactor assures a long future for nuclear electricity. Russia has had a fast breeder program for decades with satisfactory performance.
According to American think tank Third Way, there are presently six SMRs in
development in the US:
Global list of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): http://www.uxc.com/smr/uxc_SMRList.aspx
• B&W Company and Bechtel Power Corp, Charlotte, North Carolina
• NuScale Power, Corvallis, Oregon http://www.nuscalepower.com/
• Radix Power and Energy Corp, Setauket, New York http://www.uxc.com/smr/
• Holtec, Jupiter, Florida http://www.holtecinternational.com/productsandservices/smr/
• Westinghouse, Fulton, Missouri http://www.westinghousenuclear.com/New-Plants/Small-Modular-Reactor
• General Atomics, San Diego, California http://www.ga.com/energy-multiplier-module
NuScale is expected to file the first full design license application for a small modular reactor (SMR) later this year. The Oregon based developer was an early mover in the design licensing process, starting its NRC design certification pre-application project back in 2008. NuScale plans to submit its license application in late 2016 under a DoE funding agreement which will provide the firm with $217 million towards the design certification application and other commercialization engineering, analysis and testing.
NuScale is the largest single recipient of DoE funding for SMR licensing and development and the government’s support mechanism requires the group to execute testing programs in support of design development and NRC review requirements. - - - Nuclear Energy Insider, Jan 12, 2016
Large energy, no matter if it is coal, natural gas, oil, or nuclear energy, must have government licensing. Example: Boiler License Example - Permit Extract - Los Angeles .pdf
Nuclear's biggest advantage is that it will produce massive
amounts of extremely cheap CO2-free energy for as long as civilization is
expected to last.
Nuclear's biggest disadvantage is that nuclear radiation - like heat radiation from big fires - will always be hazardous and difficult to contain and handle.
Unlike industrial size fires, you can't turn nuclear radiation from power reactors 100% off quickly. It can take many years for a nuclear reactor to "cool down" to a safe level.
It will always take about 3 feet of concrete to do a good job of stopping the neutrons used to make atomic heat.
Penetrating power of alpha, beta, and gamma radiation.
Teaching model of a radiation
Thick concrete walls provide the best shielding but Composite Shields can be used when space is a constraint - such as a submarine.
Nuclear vs. Oil
How powerful is nuclear as a source of energy?
If we built 1 nuclear power plant a week for 50 years (2,600), at the end, we would have built the nuclear equivalent of 1 Cubic Mile of Oil energy.
A path towards innovating nuclear energy
At the heart of the modern energy debate is a struggle between the need for more energy globally, while simultaneously achieving lower emissions. Nuclear energy is uniquely positioned to help respond to these dueling necessities, but innovative advancements must overcome considerable barriers, writes Todd Allen.
The topic of nuclear energy can be a polarizing one, but all sides agree that the nuclear energy sector could benefit from significant innovation. The industry can and should work together to address six key areas - improving communication; increasing private investment; designating test beds; modernizing regulation; stabilizing federal funding; embracing advanced technology.
From 3-5 March, more than 120 global energy experts met in six cities across the USA to discuss innovation in nuclear energy. Unlike typical conferences organized around a series of prepared presentations, these workshops were driven by small-group brainstorming about some of nuclear energy's most pressing challenges. The goal of these workshops was twofold: to gather input from energy experts that could help improve strategy and collaboration for innovating nuclear technologies in the USA and globally; and to start an ongoing dialogue among experts and laypersons alike about nuclear energy's role in the nation's energy mix. - - - World Nuclear News editorial, March 31 2015.
How nuclear energy can be used to replace fossil fuel energies
Footnotes & Links